Ratliff v. Astrue

Fourth Circuit

Ratliff v. Astrue

234 F. App'x 148

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2007·No. No. 07-1027·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Julia A. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for summary judgment and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on her claim for supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ratliff v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-00005-GMW (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Julia A. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for summary judgment and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on her claim for supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ratliff v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-00005-GMW (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ratliff v. Astrue, 234 F. App'x 148 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

234 F. App'x 148 (Ratliff v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.