Rath v. Rath
This text of 2020 ND 96 (Rath v. Rath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 5/7/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 96
Kayla Jones, Plaintiff v. Mark Rath, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest
No. 20190330
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kayla Jones; no appearance.
Mark Rath, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant. Rath v. Rath No. 20190330
[¶1] Mark Rath appeals from orders denying his “motion for contempt” and request to reconsider. On appeal, Mark Rath argues the district court abused its discretion by not holding Kayla Rath in contempt. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). Mark Rath also made a multitude of additional arguments, including that he was denied due process. We summarily affirm the additional issues Mark Rath has raised under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rath-v-rath-nd-2020.