Ratajczak v. Yoonessi
945 N.E.2d 1030, 16 N.Y.3d 819, 2011 NY Slip Op 68263, 920 N.Y.S.2d 778, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 551
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ratajczak v. Yoonessi. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.3d 913 →
Opinion
Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 23, 2010 dismissal order denied [see 15 NY3d 913 (2010)]. Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge Lippman, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Chief Judge for his individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge Lippman denies the referred motion for recusal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ratajczak v. Yoonessi, 945 N.E.2d 1030, 16 N.Y.3d 819, 2011 NY Slip Op 68263, 920 N.Y.S.2d 778, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 551 (N.Y. 2011).
945 N.E.2d 1030 (Ratajczak v. Yoonessi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.