Ratajczak v. Yoonessi
933 N.E.2d 206, 15 N.Y.3d 745, 2010 NY Slip Op 75555, 906 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1363
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ratajczak v. Yoonessi. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.3d 913 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument etc. denied [see 14 NY3d 795 (2010)]. Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge Lippman, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has [746]*746no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Chief Judge for his individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge Lippman denies the referred motion for recusal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ratajczak v. Yoonessi, 933 N.E.2d 206, 15 N.Y.3d 745, 2010 NY Slip Op 75555, 906 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1363 (N.Y. 2010).
933 N.E.2d 206 (Ratajczak v. Yoonessi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.