Rasmussen v. Home Industry Iron Works
199 F. 990, 117 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1795
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 1912
DocketNo. 2,425
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 199 F. 990 (Rasmussen v. Home Industry Iron Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rasmussen v. Home Industry Iron Works, 199 F. 990, 117 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1795 (5th Cir. 1912).
Opinion
On the facts we concur in the finding and decree of the District Court. 197 Fed. 661. To enforce the contract as claimed by appellant, without proof of actual damages, would be inequitable, permitting the appellant to enrich himself at the expense of the appellee. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Trans-Asiatic Oil Ltd., S.A. v. Apex Oil Company
804 F.2d 773 (First Circuit, 1986)
Northwestern Terra Cotta Co. v. Caldwell
234 F. 491 (Eighth Circuit, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
199 F. 990, 117 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rasmussen-v-home-industry-iron-works-ca5-1912.