Rasik v. State
This text of 717 So. 2d 618 (Rasik v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles RASIK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Charles Rasik, Miami, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing as to whether appellant is entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent in the Village South Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Center. See Whitehead v. State, 677 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 So. 2d 618, 1998 WL 646697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rasik-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.