Rasik v. State
717 So. 2d 618, 1998 WL 646697
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 1998·No. 98-2161·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Charles RASIK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Charles Rasik, Miami, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing as to whether appellant is entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent in the Village South Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Center. See Whitehead v. State, 677 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rasik v. State, 717 So. 2d 618, 1998 WL 646697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 618 (Rasik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Comer v. State
909 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Hamilton v. State
898 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Leach v. State
774 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Kamerman v. State
765 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)