Kamerman v. State
This text of 765 So. 2d 63 (Kamerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerry KAMERMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jerry Kamerman, Sanderson, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant's sworn motion for jail time credit while attending the Turning Point program is reversed. On remand, the court shall either attach portions of the record conclusively showing no entitlement to relief or shall order an evidentiary hearing as to whether the program qualifies appellant for jail time credit. See Rasik v. State, 717 So.2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Whitehead v. State, 677 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
GUNTHER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
765 So. 2d 63, 2000 WL 174604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamerman-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.