Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kamerman v. State

Kamerman v. State

765 So. 2d 63, 2000 WL 174604
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2000·No. 4D99-1747·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

765 So.2d 63 (2000)

Jerry KAMERMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D99-1747.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 16, 2000.

Jerry Kamerman, Sanderson, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant's sworn motion for jail time credit while attending the Turning Point program is reversed. On remand, the court shall either attach portions of the record conclusively showing no entitlement to relief or shall order an evidentiary hearing as to whether the program qualifies appellant for jail time credit. See Rasik v. State, 717 So.2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Whitehead v. State, 677 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

GUNTHER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kamerman v. State, 765 So. 2d 63, 2000 WL 174604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 63 (Kamerman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Comer v. State
909 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Hamilton v. State
898 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Carrier v. State
894 So. 2d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cregan v. State
884 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Smith v. State
849 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Columbro v. State
777 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Leach v. State
774 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)