Rasheed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rasheed v. State

449 So. 2d 981, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13028

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1984

DocketNo. AX-177

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 449 So. 2d 981 (Rasheed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rasheed v. State, 449 So. 2d 981, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to raise an issue by motion for post conviction relief, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which could properly have been litigated during the trial proceedings and reviewed upon direct appeal. Appellant's direct appeal was exhausted by this Court’s affirmance of his conviction and sentence for burglary and grand theft in Rasheed v. State, 433 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief as appellant’s single issue involved whether the circumstantial evidence presented at his trial was sufficient to support a finding of guilt, an issue not cognizable through collateral attack, see Demps v. State, 416 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla.1982); Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673, 675 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155, 103 S.Ct. 799, 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to raise an issue by motion for post conviction relief, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which could properly have been litigated during the trial proceedings and reviewed upon direct appeal. Appellant's direct appeal was exhausted by this Court’s affirmance of his conviction and sentence for burglary and grand theft in Rasheed v. State, 433 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief as appellant’s single issue involved whether the circumstantial evidence presented at his trial was sufficient to support a finding of guilt, an issue not cognizable through collateral attack, see Demps v. State, 416 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla.1982); Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673, 675 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155, 103 S.Ct. 799, 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

449 So. 2d 981, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rasheed-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack