Green v. State
This text of 591 So. 2d 1159 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves the admissibility of contraband (a controlled substance) which was, upon an encounter with the police, “abandoned” rather than “seized” and is affirmed on the authority of California v. Hodari D., — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); Curry v. State, 570 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dis’m., 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 1980) and A. G. v. State, 562 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); State v. Perez, 592 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), juris, accepted, 570 So.2d 1305 (Fla.1990); Butler v. State, 579 So.2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); and State v. Arnold, 579 So.2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (on rehearing).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 So. 2d 1159, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 649, 1992 WL 9657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.