Rasberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rasberry v. State

228 S.E.2d 186, 139 Ga. App. 189, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1731

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 1, 1976

Docket52235

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 228 S.E.2d 186 (Rasberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rasberry v. State, 228 S.E.2d 186, 139 Ga. App. 189, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1731 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from defendant’s conviction of speeding and his sentence of a $25 fine or 30 days in jail. The errors alleged by the appellant all require review of a transcript of the bench trial below. However, the proceedings below were not reported, the parties cannot agree upon the facts of the case, the trial court judge is unable to recall the facts and he has entered an order so stating. Therefore, these enumerations of error pertaining to matters not appearing of record cannot be considered. Diamond v. Chatham County Board of Tax Assessors, 135 Ga. App. 645 (218 SE2d 657) and cits.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

*190 Johnnie E. Rasberry, pro se. Leonard Cohen, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stolz, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from defendant’s conviction of speeding and his sentence of a $25 fine or 30 days in jail. The errors alleged by the appellant all require review of a transcript of the bench trial below. However, the proceedings below were not reported, the parties cannot agree upon the facts of the case, the trial court judge is unable to recall the facts and he has entered an order so stating. Therefore, these enumerations of error pertaining to matters not appearing of record cannot be considered. Diamond v. Chatham County Board of Tax Assessors, 135 Ga. App. 645 (218 SE2d 657) and cits.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

*190 Johnnie E. Rasberry, pro se. Leonard Cohen, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.E.2d 186, 139 Ga. App. 189, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rasberry-v-state-gactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack