Ewing v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ewing v. State

249 S.E.2d 696, 147 Ga. App. 546, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2767

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1978·No. 56362·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for speeding. The enumerations of error all require a consideration of the evidence. No transcript of evidence or stipulation of the evidence has been submitted. Since the evidence has not been furnished to this court by any of the methods provided in Code Ann. § 6-805, no consideration of questions involving the evidence can be made. Rasberry v. State, 139 Ga. App. 189 (228 SE2d 186).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Matthew Brewster Ewing, pro se. Herbert A. Rivers, Solicitor, Charles C. Clay, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for speeding. The enumerations of error all require a consideration of the evidence. No transcript of evidence or stipulation of the evidence has been submitted. Since the evidence has not been furnished to this court by any of the methods provided in Code Ann. § 6-805, no consideration of questions involving the evidence can be made. Rasberry v. State, 139 Ga. App. 189 (228 SE2d 186).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Matthew Brewster Ewing, pro se. Herbert A. Rivers, Solicitor, Charles C. Clay, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

Ewing v. State, 249 S.E.2d 696, 147 Ga. App. 546, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

249 S.E.2d 696 (Ewing v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related