Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ewing v. State

Ewing v. State

249 S.E.2d 696, 147 Ga. App. 546, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2767
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 16, 1978
Docket56362
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.E.2d 696 (Ewing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ewing v. State, 249 S.E.2d 696, 147 Ga. App. 546, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for speeding. The enumerations of error all require a consideration of the evidence. No transcript of evidence or stipulation of the evidence has been submitted. Since the evidence has not been furnished to this court by any of the methods provided in Code Ann. § 6-805, no consideration of questions involving the evidence can be made. Rasberry v. State, 139 Ga. App. 189 (228 SE2d 186).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Matthew Brewster Ewing, pro se. Herbert A. Rivers, Solicitor, Charles C. Clay, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ibietatorremendia v. State
294 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 S.E.2d 696, 147 Ga. App. 546, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-v-state-gactapp-1978.