Rapoport v. City of New York
116 N.E.2d 244, 306 N.Y. 636
This text of 116 N.E.2d 244 (Rapoport v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rapoport v. City of New York, 116 N.E.2d 244, 306 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1953).
Opinion
Beckie Rapoport et al., Appellants,
v.
City of New York, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Bernard Meyerson, Irving Coopersmith and Louis Dubow for appellants.
Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Fred Iscol of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: VAN VOORHIS, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Valentine v. City of New York
86 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Sisson v. City of New York
20 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 N.E.2d 244, 306 N.Y. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapoport-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1953.