Rapoport v. City of New York

116 N.E.2d 244, 306 N.Y. 636

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

306 N.Y. 636 (1953)

Beckie Rapoport et al., Appellants,
v.
City of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 19, 1953. Decided November 25, 1953

Bernard Meyerson, Irving Coopersmith and Louis Dubow for appellants.

Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Fred Iscol of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: VAN VOORHIS, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

306 N.Y. 636 (1953)

Beckie Rapoport et al., Appellants,
v.
City of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 19, 1953. Decided November 25, 1953

Bernard Meyerson, Irving Coopersmith and Louis Dubow for appellants.

Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Fred Iscol of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: VAN VOORHIS, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Rapoport v. City of New York, 116 N.E.2d 244, 306 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1953).

Pincite

116 N.E.2d 244 (Rapoport v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valentine v. City of New York

86 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Sisson v. City of New York

20 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)