Rapino v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rapino v. City of New York

259 A.D.2d 608, 684 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2497

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 608 (Rapino v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rapino v. City of New York, 259 A.D.2d 608, 684 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated October 9, 1997, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant American Golf Corporation.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant American Golf Corporation is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against that defendant.

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant American Golf Corporation (see, Drennen v City of New York, 256 AD2d 379; Longo v American Golf Corp., 256 AD2d 387; see also, Palka v Servicemaster Mgt. Servs. Corp., 83 NY2d 579). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated October 9, 1997, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant American Golf Corporation.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant American Golf Corporation is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against that defendant.

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant American Golf Corporation (see, Drennen v City of New York, 256 AD2d 379; Longo v American Golf Corp., 256 AD2d 387; see also, Palka v Servicemaster Mgt. Servs. Corp., 83 NY2d 579). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 608, 684 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapino-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack