Ransom v. Warden
204 A.2d 563, 236 Md. 639, 1964 Md. LEXIS 953
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 16, 1964·No. [App. No. 53, September Term, 1964.]·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
RANSOM
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
*640 Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
This application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief contains no statement of reasons, as required by Maryland Rule BK46 b, and must be dismissed on that ground. Cf. Murel v. Director, 231 Md. 661. In any event, we think the opinion of Judge Grady in the court below dealt fully and adequately with all of the contentions raised in his petition.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ransom v. Warden, 204 A.2d 563, 236 Md. 639, 1964 Md. LEXIS 953 (Md. 1964).
204 A.2d 563 (Ransom v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferrell v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary
216 A.2d 740 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)
Greene v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
210 A.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
McDonald v. Director
204 A.2d 563 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)