McDonald v. Director
This text of 204 A.2d 563 (McDonald v. Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
McDONALD
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency attacks the constitutionality of the Act on several grounds. His contentions are all answered by prior decisions of this Court. See Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Meredith v. Director, 226 Md. 653; Simmons v. Director, 227 Md. 661; McDonogh v. Director, 229 Md. 626; Williams v. Director, 232 Md. 632. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, relied on by the applicant is clearly distinguishable on the facts.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.2d 563, 236 Md. 642, 1964 Md. LEXIS 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-director-md-1964.