McDonald v. Director

204 A.2d 563, 236 Md. 642, 1964 Md. LEXIS 956
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 16, 1964·No. [App. No. 58, September Term, 1964.]·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

236 Md. 642 (1964)
204 A.2d 563

McDONALD
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

[App. No. 58, September Term, 1964.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 16, 1964.

Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency attacks the constitutionality of the Act on several grounds. His contentions are all answered by prior decisions of this Court. See Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Meredith v. Director, 226 Md. 653; Simmons v. Director, 227 Md. 661; McDonogh v. Director, 229 Md. 626; Williams v. Director, 232 Md. 632. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, relied on by the applicant is clearly distinguishable on the facts.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Director, 204 A.2d 563, 236 Md. 642, 1964 Md. LEXIS 956 (Md. 1964).

204 A.2d 563 (McDonald v. Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sansbury v. Director of Patuxent Institution
206 A.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Laird v. Director of Patuxent Institution
205 A.2d 238 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Ransom v. Warden
204 A.2d 563 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)