Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

785 So. 2d 689, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6936, 2001 WL 527394
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2001·No. No. 4D99-3967·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The appeals referee determined the claimant was discharged for misconduct and thus ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. The record supports the referee’s findings, and the law supports her decision. See Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., 743 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (contentious and argumentative refusal to perform assigned work justified determination of misconduct); Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 689 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (repeated warnings and no explanation for continued unsatisfactory behavior justified determination of misconduct). Benefits were properly denied.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur. FARMER, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 785 So. 2d 689, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6936, 2001 WL 527394 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 689 (Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
689 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Odom v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
586 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
743 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)