Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
This text of 785 So. 2d 689 (Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The appeals referee determined the claimant was discharged for misconduct and thus ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. The record supports the referee’s findings, and the law supports her decision. See Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., 743 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (contentious and argumentative refusal to perform assigned work justified determination of misconduct); Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 689 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (repeated warnings and no explanation for continued unsatisfactory behavior justified determination of misconduct). Benefits were properly denied.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
785 So. 2d 689, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6936, 2001 WL 527394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rankine-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2001.