Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
743 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13448, 1999 WL 817823
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1999·No. No. 98-3430·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We conclude that the appeals referee’s findings concerning the appellant’s contentious and argumentative refusal to perform the work assigned him justified the determination that he was discharged for misconduct and therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. See Kraft, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 478 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Hines v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 455 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Citrus Central v. Detwiler, 368 So.2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., 743 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13448, 1999 WL 817823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
743 So. 2d 1152 (Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Givens v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
888 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
785 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Johnson v. Guardianship of Singleton
743 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)