Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.

743 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13448, 1999 WL 817823
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 13, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3430
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 743 So. 2d 1152 (Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., 743 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13448, 1999 WL 817823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We conclude that the appeals referee’s findings concerning the appellant’s contentious and argumentative refusal to perform the work assigned him justified the determination that he was discharged for misconduct and therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. See Kraft, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 478 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Hines v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 455 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Citrus Central v. Detwiler, 368 So.2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Givens v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
888 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Rankine v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
785 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Johnson v. Guardianship of Singleton
743 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13448, 1999 WL 817823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-ikon-office-solutions-inc-fladistctapp-1999.