Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
This text of 743 So. 2d 1152 (Boyd v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that the appeals referee’s findings concerning the appellant’s contentious and argumentative refusal to perform the work assigned him justified the determination that he was discharged for misconduct and therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. See Kraft, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 478 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Hines v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 455 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Citrus Central v. Detwiler, 368 So.2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
743 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13448, 1999 WL 817823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-ikon-office-solutions-inc-fladistctapp-1999.