Ranger Insurance Co. v. Lewis

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 29, 2004
Docket2004-UP-591
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ranger Insurance Co. v. Lewis (Ranger Insurance Co. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ranger Insurance Co. v. Lewis, (S.C. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PREHEARING REPORT

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals


Ex Parte: Ranger Insurance Company,        Appellant.

In Re:  The State,        Respondent,

v.

Kevin J. Lewis,        Defendant,

and Brown Bonding Company & Ranger Insurance Company,        Surety for the Defendant.


Appeal From Lexington County
Marc H. Westbrook, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-591
Submitted October 1, 2004 – Filed November 29, 2004


AFFIRMED


Mathias Genard Chaplin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

W. Rutledge Martin, Assistant Attorney General, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ranger Insurance Company, the surety for Kevin J. Lewis’ bond, appeals from a contempt order requiring the $5,000 bond to be estreated, less any expenses used in attempting to recommit Lewis.  Ranger Insurance also claims it is entitled to damages for being improperly suspended from writing bonds in Lexington County.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR, and the following authorities:

Issue IFirst Sav. Bank v. McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) (holding that mere allegations of error do not amount to an abuse of discretion and that where supporting authority is not provided for an argument, it will be deemed abandoned); Solomon v. City Realty Co., 262 S.C. 198, 201, 203 S.E.2d 435, 436 (1974) (deeming an issue abandoned that was not supported by authority).  Issue IIWilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) (“It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review.”).

AFFIRMED.[1]

STILWELL, BEATTY, and SHORT, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilder Corp. v. Wilke
497 S.E.2d 731 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)
Solomon v. CITY REALTY COMPANY
203 S.E.2d 435 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)
First Savings Bank v. McLean
444 S.E.2d 513 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ranger Insurance Co. v. Lewis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranger-insurance-co-v-lewis-scctapp-2004.