Randolph v. State

234 S.W.2d 235, 155 Tex. Crim. 432, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1878
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 1, 1950
Docket24930
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 234 S.W.2d 235 (Randolph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randolph v. State, 234 S.W.2d 235, 155 Tex. Crim. 432, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1878 (Tex. 1950).

Opinions

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possessing in Lubbock County, Texas, intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and the jury assessed his punishment at a fine of two hundred dollars, it being alleged that Lubbock County was dry area. From this conviction appellant gave notice of appeal.

[433]*433The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

By affidavit appellant for the first time now claims that he has been deprived of his bills of exception and statement of facts without fault or negligence on his part.

The purported bills of exception are not brought forward and we are not in fact able to determine whether appellant, in fact, has been injured.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baldwin v. State
756 S.W.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ellis v. State
633 S.W.2d 340 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Gamble v. State
590 S.W.2d 507 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Timmons v. State
586 S.W.2d 509 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Bridges v. State
360 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Randolph v. State
234 S.W.2d 235 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 S.W.2d 235, 155 Tex. Crim. 432, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.