Randle v. Davis

N.D. Mississippi

Randle v. Davis

DecidedAugust 4, 2021

Docket1:20-cv-00069

StatusUnknown

This text of Randle v. Davis (Randle v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randle v. Davis, (N.D. Miss. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

THEOTIS RANDLE PETITIONER

v. No. 1:20CV69-SA-RP

JOSHUA DAVIS RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY The court has entered a final judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, or in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or § 2241, and the court, considering the record in the case and the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. For the reasons stated in its opinion, the court finds that the Petitioner has failed to “demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve issues in a different manner; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 3394 n.4, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1993) (superseded by statute) (citations and quotations omitted); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1) and (2). Specifically, the court finds, for the reasons set forth in its memorandum opinion and final judgment, that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice and without evidentiary hearing as untimely filed. SO ORDERED, this, the 4th day of August, 2021.

/s/ Sharion Aycock U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

THEOTIS RANDLE PETITIONER

v. No. 1:20CV69-SA-RP

JOSHUA DAVIS RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY The court has entered a final judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, or in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or § 2241, and the court, considering the record in the case and the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. For the reasons stated in its opinion, the court finds that the Petitioner has failed to “demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve issues in a different manner; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 3394 n.4, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1993) (superseded by statute) (citations and quotations omitted); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1) and (2). Specifically, the court finds, for the reasons set forth in its memorandum opinion and final judgment, that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice and without evidentiary hearing as untimely filed. SO ORDERED, this, the 4th day of August, 2021.

/s/ Sharion Aycock U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Randle v. Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randle-v-davis-msnd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack