Randell v. State

397 S.W.3d 531, 2013 WL 1615609, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 457
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Randell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 549
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 2013·No. No. ED 98992·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barry L. Randell appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randell v. State, 397 S.W.3d 531, 2013 WL 1615609, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 457 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

397 S.W.3d 531 (Randell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.