Randell v. State
365 S.W.3d 621, 2012 WL 1416808, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 549
Opinion
ORDER
James Randell appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randell v. State, 365 S.W.3d 621, 2012 WL 1416808, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 549 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
365 S.W.3d 621 (Randell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State
365 S.W.3d 621 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)