Randall v. State
60 S.E. 328, 3 Ga. App. 653, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 401
Opinion
1. The evidence fully sustains the verdict.
2. There is no error in the charge of the court as to the corroboration necessary to support the testimony of an accomplice.
3. In the absence of a written request, the failure of the judge to charge the jury that “the law presumes every fire to be accidental, until the contrary appears, where a man is charged with the offense of arson,” is not reversible error; especially is this true where the arson is proved by direct testimony. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randall v. State, 60 S.E. 328, 3 Ga. App. 653, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 401 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
60 S.E. 328 (Randall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stacey v. State
426 S.E.2d 401 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Pulliam v. State
28 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Jones v. State
176 S.E. 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
State v. Smith
252 P. 530 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)
Griffin v. State
130 S.E. 368 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Robinson v. State
89 S.E. 434 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Sutton v. State
88 S.E. 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Simon v. Mayor of Savannah
60 S.E. 1036 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)