Randall v. State
This text of 60 S.E. 328 (Randall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence fully sustains the verdict.
2. There is no error in the charge of the court as to the corroboration necessary to support the testimony of an accomplice.
3. In the absence of a written request, the failure of the judge to charge the jury that “the law presumes every fire to be accidental, until the contrary appears, where a man is charged with the offense of arson,” is not reversible error; especially is this true where the arson is proved by direct testimony. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 S.E. 328, 3 Ga. App. 653, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-state-gactapp-1908.