Griffin v. State

129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 186
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16611
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 S.E. 666 (Griffin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. State, 129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

1. Upon the hearing of a motion to arrest the judgment in a criminal case the court looks only at the indictment and the verdict, the presumption being that the evidence authorized the verdict. Watson v. State, 116 Ga. 607 (6) (43 S. E. 32).

2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the court properly struck from the motion in arrest of judgment matter that was extrinsic to the face of the record, and properly repelled evidence which showed facts not appearing on the face of the record, and properly overruled the motion to arrest the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Blood/wortli, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Register v. State
15 S.E.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-state-gactapp-1925.