Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Randall v. State

Randall v. State

766 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9624, 2000 WL 1049873
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2000·No. No. 1D98-1138·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Cecil Randall (Randall) raises several issues on appeal, one of which challenges his sentence as an habitual felony offender and reoffender; the reoffender sentence was imposed pursuant to the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Punishment Act, section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1997) (the PRR act). Because Randall was sentenced to twenty-six years for unarmed robbery un[377] der the PRR act and fifteen years is the maximum sentence under this act, we reverse and remand for resentencing as a prison releasee reoffender. Smith v. State, 754 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We affirm in all other respects, including Randall’s twenty-six-year sentence as an habitual felony offender.

ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR. BENTON, J., CONCURS WITH OPINION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randall v. State, 766 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9624, 2000 WL 1049873 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 376 (Randall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
754 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Grant v. State
745 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Glave v. State
745 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Alfonso v. State
761 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Lewis v. State
751 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Melton v. State
746 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Dragani v. State
759 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Adams v. State
750 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)