Randall v. State
This text of 766 So. 2d 376 (Randall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Cecil Randall (Randall) raises several issues on appeal, one of which challenges his sentence as an habitual felony offender and reoffender; the reoffender sentence was imposed pursuant to the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Punishment Act, section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1997) (the PRR act). Because Randall was sentenced to twenty-six years for unarmed robbery un[377]*377der the PRR act and fifteen years is the maximum sentence under this act, we reverse and remand for resentencing as a prison releasee reoffender. Smith v. State, 754 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We affirm in all other respects, including Randall’s twenty-six-year sentence as an habitual felony offender.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
766 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9624, 2000 WL 1049873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.