Randal v. State Highway Department
148 S.E. 57, 150 S.C. 302, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 140
This text of 148 S.E. 57 (Randal v. State Highway Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Randal v. State Highway Department, 148 S.E. 57, 150 S.C. 302, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 140 (S.C. 1929).
Opinion
May 2, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge Johnson, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, BLEASE, STABLER and CARTER concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fairey v. City of Orangeburg
88 S.E.2d 617 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Taylor v. Lexington Water Power Co.
163 S.E. 137 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)
Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway Department
157 S.E. 842 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway Department
151 S.E. 887 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 57, 150 S.C. 302, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-v-state-highway-department-sc-1929.