Rancosky v. Washington National Ins., Co., Pet

144 A.3d 926, 636 Pa. 465, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1910, 2016 WL 4530028
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 30, 2016
Docket124 WAL 2016 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 144 A.3d 926 (Rancosky v. Washington National Ins., Co., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rancosky v. Washington National Ins., Co., Pet, 144 A.3d 926, 636 Pa. 465, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1910, 2016 WL 4530028 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the is *466 sue[s] set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue[s], as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether this Court should ratify the requirements of Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 437 Pa.Super. 108, 649 A.2d 680 (1994), appeal denied, 540 Pa. 641, 659 A.2d 560 (1995), for establishing insurer bad faith under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371, and assuming the answer to be in the affirmative, whether the Superior Court erred in holding that Terletsky factor of a “motive of self-interest or ill-will” is merely a discretionary consideration rather than a mandatory prerequisite to proving bad faith?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rancosky v. Washington National Ins. Co., Aplt.
170 A.3d 364 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 A.3d 926, 636 Pa. 465, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1910, 2016 WL 4530028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rancosky-v-washington-national-ins-co-pet-pa-2016.