Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. Dressman

175 N.W.2d 299, 185 Neb. 328, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 543
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 13, 1970
Docket37536
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 N.W.2d 299 (Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. Dressman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. Dressman, 175 N.W.2d 299, 185 Neb. 328, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 543 (Neb. 1970).

Opinion

*329 McCown, J.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of an appealable order. The district court sustained, a special appearance by defendant, an individual resident of Kansas. Objections to personal jurisdiction were directed at the invalidity of issuance, service, and return of summons.

An order sustaining an objection to personal jurisdiction is not final within the meaning of section 25-1902, R. R. S. 1943. See, Erdman v. National Indemnity Co., 178 Neb. 312, 133 N. W. 2d 472; Busboom v. Gregory, 179 Neb. 254, 137 N. W. 2d 825. This action has. not terminated. Plaintiff has the procedural choices pointed out in Busboom v. Gregory, supra.

Plaintiff’s appeal from the order sustaining defendant’s special appearance should be, and hereby is, dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holste v. Burlington Northern Railroad
592 N.W.2d 894 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
Krueger v. Zarley
425 N.W.2d 893 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 N.W.2d 299, 185 Neb. 328, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranch-farm-lines-inc-v-dressman-neb-1970.