Krueger v. Zarley
This text of 425 N.W.2d 893 (Krueger v. Zarley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the district court which denied his motion for summary judgment, “the court having no jurisdiction,” claiming such action to be in error.
The record itself does not disclose the reason for the trial court’s finding that it had no jurisdiction. Whatever the basis for that finding, the fact remains that generally, a successful challenge to jurisdiction does not constitute a final disposition of a case and is not appealable. Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. Dressman, 185 Neb. 328, 175 N.W.2d 299 (1970); Busboom v. Gregory, 179 Neb. 254, 137 N.W.2d 825 (1965).
In any event, we have repeatedly stated that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final order and therefore is not appealable. Union Pacific RR. Co. v. Kaiser Ag. Chem. Co., ante p. 160, 425 N.W.2d 872 (1988); Schmuecker Bros. Implement v. Sobotka, 217 Neb. 114, 348 N.W.2d 130 (1984).
Plaintiff’s appeal is ordered dismissed.
Appeal dismissed .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 N.W.2d 893, 229 Neb. 203, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krueger-v-zarley-neb-1988.