Ramza Mulalic v. Gwinnett Family Dental Care
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ May 03, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A13A0656. RAMZA MULALIC v. GWINNETT FAMILY DENTAL CARE.
Pursuant to this Court’s grant of a discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35
(8), Ramza Mulalic filed this appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of her motion
to set aside the judgment entered on October 9, 2006. Motions under OCGA § 9-11-
60 to set aside judgments, however, “shall be brought within three years from entry
of the judgment complained of.” OCGA § 9-11-60 (f). What the trial court deemed
as Mulalic’s motion to set aside was not filed until May 29, 2012. Therefore, as the
trial court was without jurisdiction to consider Mulalic’s motion in any event, the
appeal from the denial of this untimely motion was improvidently granted and must
be DISMISSED.
Mulalic’s proper recourse was to file a motion under OCGA § 9-11-60 (g)
seeking relief under Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d
426) (1980). Such motions may be filed at any time. OCGA § 9-11-60 (g). Because
Mulalic’s motion in this case did not raise the issues contemplated in such a motion, we cannot consider whether she was entitled to relief under Cambron v. Canal Ins.
Co.
Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/03/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramza Mulalic v. Gwinnett Family Dental Care (Ramza Mulalic v. Gwinnett Family Dental Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.