Ramsey v. Mingledorff
This text of 189 S.E. 521 (Ramsey v. Mingledorff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bamsey was elected in a school district election to the office of trustee of such district. The county board of education refused to issue Bamsey a commission, and he instituted these mandamus proceedings. The judge denied a mandamus absolute, and on exception to -this court that judgment was reversed. Ramsey v. Mingledorff, 181 Ga. 803 (184 S. E. 322). Before the judgment of this court was made the judgment of the trial court, the defendants offered an amendment to their answer to the petition for mandamus in this case. The plaintiff demurred to this amendment, and the bill of exceptions now before this court assigns error on the order of the judge overruling the same. Ther.e is no exception to any judgment granting or denying a mandamus absolute. Accordingly the motion to dismiss 'the bill of exceptions must prevail. Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 501, 504 (168 S. E. 577); Board of Education v. Sheffield, 177 Ga. 100 (169 S. E. 302).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 S.E. 521, 183 Ga. 701, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-mingledorff-ga-1937.