Board of Education v. Sheffield

169 S.E. 302, 177 Ga. 100, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 124
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1933·No. No. 9402·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “The defendant in a mandamus suit can not bring a bill of exceptions directly to this court merely for the purpose of reviewing a judgment overruling a demurrer to the petition; but in such case he should preserve his exceptions and come to this court only after a final judgment against him, and in the bill of exceptions then brought he should assign error upon the final judgment. In the present case the bill of exceptions was defective as containing no exception to the judgment granting the mandamus absolute.” Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 500 (168 S. E. 577), and cit.

2. The only exception in the present case is to the overruling of a demurrer to the petition for mandamus. This, as ruled in the above cited case, is not such a final judgment as is the basis for a direct bill of exceptions in a mandamus case.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices conour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Education v. Sheffield, 169 S.E. 302, 177 Ga. 100, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 124 (Ga. 1933).

169 S.E. 302 (Board of Education v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of MacOn v. Herrington
32 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Nichols v. Hampton
31 S.E.2d 659 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
MacNeill v. Wood
28 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Dooly v. Gates
15 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Ramsey v. Mingledorff
189 S.E. 521 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)