Ramsey v. Cedar Trucking Co., Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia
DecidedNovember 10, 2020
Docket2:20-cv-00413
StatusUnknown

This text of Ramsey v. Cedar Trucking Co., Inc. (Ramsey v. Cedar Trucking Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramsey v. Cedar Trucking Co., Inc., (S.D.W. Va. 2020).

Opinion

CHARLESTON DIVISION

WILLIAM D. RAMSEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00413

CEDAR TRUCKING CO., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

On July 21, 2020, the Clerk of this Court entered a default, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) because defendant Cedar Trucking Co., Inc. did not respond to a complaint regarding an order from the Department of Labor to pay the defendant for black lung benefits [ECF No. 11]. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment and an affidavit in support of that motion. [ECF No. 12]. The motion and affidavit presented the amount due and stated that the defendant is neither an infant, an incompetent, nor a member of the United States Military. Based upon its review of the motion and affidavit, the court has determined that a hearing is unnecessary. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1), the court ENTERS default judgment against the defendant Cedar Trucking Co., Inc. in the amount of $49,523.14, plus post-judgment interest, to be paid to plaintiff William D. Ramsey. Furthermore, for the reasons outlined below, the court ORDERS the defendant Cedar Trucking Co., Inc. to pay plaintiff’s counsel, Leonard J. Stayton and Leonard J. Stayton P.S.C., reasonable attorneys’ fees of $12,389.50, plus post-judgment interest, for services rendered in this action. Plaintiff William D. Ramsey (“Ramsey”), an individual and resident of Kanawha County, West Virginia, brought the current action against Defendant Cedar Trucking Co., Inc. (“Cedar Trucking”), a domestic corporation with its principal place of business in Kanawha County, West Virginia. Plaintiffs Leonard J. Stayton and Leonard J. Stayton P.S.C. (“Stayton”) are a natural person and a legal services corporation, respectively, both with the same office in Martin County, Kentucky. On July 10, 2014, plaintiffs Ramsey and Stayton filed a claim for black lung benefits against his employer, Cedar Trucking. Ramsey alleged that he qualified for benefits under the

Black Lung Benefits Act, which allows coal workers to collect benefits from employers when such workers are disabled by pneumoconiosis, also known as black lung disease. See 30 U.S.C. § 901. After receiving proper service of a Notice of Hearing and a Pre-Hearing Order, neither Cedar Trucking nor its counsel appeared for the resulting hearing on December 1, 2016. On February 21, 2017, Honorable Drew A. Swank, an administrative law judge with the United States Department of Labor, issued a Decision and Order Awarding Benefits for plaintiff Ramsey of black lung benefits. Judge Swank stated, “[t]hrough an unrebutted legal presumption, [Ramsey] has proven that his total pulmonary disability was substantially caused by his coal workers’ pneumonoconiosis . . . and is entitled to benefits.” [ECF No. 12]. Later, on June 6, 2018,

Judge Swank issued an order for attorneys’ fees for plaintiff. Cedar Trucking did not appeal either order. A final order, under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291, is one that “ends litigation on merits and leaves nothing for court to do but execute judgment.” Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Intern. Union of Operating Eng’rs & Participating Emp’s, 571 U.S. 177, 134 S. Ct. 773, (2014). In this case, order making them final. The plaintiffs filed a complaint and summons with this Court on June 6, 2020 alleging that Cedar Trucking had made no payments to the plaintiff after being ordered to by the Department of [ECF No. 11], followed by the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and affidavit. [ECF No. 12]. II. Jurisdiction The Supreme Court held in Butz v. Economou that an administrative law judge is “functionally comparable” to a judge, stating that their “powers are often, if not generally, comparable to those of a trial judge: He may issue subpoenas, rule on proffers of evidence, regulate the course of the hearing, and make or recommend decisions.” Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 513, (1978). This Court maintains jurisdiction over this case to enforce Judge Swank’s legitimate orders through 33 U.S.C. § 921 (d): “If any employer or his officers or agents fails to comply with

a compensation order making an award, that has become final, any beneficiary of such award or the deputy commissioner making the order, may apply for the enforcement of the order to the Federal district court for the judicial district in which the injury occurred.” 33 U.S.C. § 921. III. Legal Standard A. Default Judgment Default judgment is available “when the adversary process has been halted because of an essentially unresponsive party.” S.E.C. v. Lawbaugh, 359 F. Supp. 2d 418, 421 (D. Md. 2005). Under Rule 55, which governs default judgments, “trial judges are vested with discretion, which must be liberally exercised, in entering [default] judgments and in providing relief therefrom.”

United States v. Moradi, 673 F.2d 725, 727 (4th Cir. 1982). A defendant’s failure to respond constitutes an admission of the well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint, except as related to damages. Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778, 780 (4th Cir. 2001).

B. Attorney’s Fees In calculating an award of attorney’s fees, a court must first determine a Lodestar figure F.3d 313, 320 (4th Cir. 2008)). In order to determine the reasonableness of the requested hours and rates, the court must be guided by the twelve factors set forth in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 448 F.2d 714, 717–19 (5th Cir. 1974), overruled on other grounds, Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489 U.S. 87 (1989). See Grissom, 549 F.3d at 321 (citing Barber v. Kimbrell’s Inc., 577 F.2d 216, 226 (4th Cir. 1978) (adopting twelve factor test set forth in Johnson)). These factors are used to calculate reasonable hourly rates and a reasonable number of hours expended by counsel, resulting in a Lodestar fee.1 IV. Discussion

A. Federal Black Lung Benefits The United States Department of Labor ordered Cedar Trucking to pay benefits to Ramsey beginning July 2014. According to Ramsey’s affidavit, these unpaid benefits total $35,609, accounting for July 2014 through July 2017. The Department of Labor began paying Ramsey’s benefits from August 2017 to the present, an amount totaling $32,931.60 (an amount now owed by Cedar Trucking to the Department of Labor). Federal law dictates: “[i]f any compensation, payable under the terms of an award, is not paid within ten days after it becomes due, there shall be added to such unpaid compensation an amount equal to 20 per centum thereof.” 33 U.S.C.A. § 914. This 20% compensation must be paid “with respect to all amounts paid by the fund on behalf

of such operator.” 20 C.F.R. § 725.607.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butz v. Economou
438 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Blanchard v. Bergeron
489 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Nasser Moradi
673 F.2d 725 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lawbaugh
359 F. Supp. 2d 418 (D. Maryland, 2005)
Ryan v. Homecomings Financial Network
253 F.3d 778 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ramsey v. Cedar Trucking Co., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-cedar-trucking-co-inc-wvsd-2020.