Ramsey v. Baggeston
This text of 367 A.2d 1081 (Ramsey v. Baggeston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have reviewed the record in the case and the trial justice’s decision conditionally granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issue of damages only unless defendant consented to an additur of $7500. That review satisfies us that the trial justice fully complied with the obligations imposed upon him under our rules as enunciated in a long line of cases and most recently in Fontaine v. Devonis, 114 R.I. 541, 336 A.2d 847 (1975); Grenier v. Royal Cab, Inc., 114 R.I. 11, 327 A.2d 272 (1974).
Accordingly, we deny and dismiss the defendant’s appeal, [475]*475and we remit the case to the Superior 'Court for a new trial on the issue of damages only unless the defendant shall, within a period to be fixed by that court, consent to the additur heretofore awarded by the trial justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
367 A.2d 1081, 117 R.I. 474, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-baggeston-ri-1977.