Ramsey v. Baggeston
This text of 366 A.2d 830 (Ramsey v. Baggeston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case is assigned to the calendar for December 13, 1976, [951]*9519:30 a.m. for oral argument. The defendant will be expected to show cause why his appeal should not be summarily disposed of because of this Court’s previous statement that the trial justice will not be overturned in cases of this sort unless he was clearly wrong, Labree v. Major, 111 R.I. 657, 306 A.2d 808 (1973). He should also be prepared to discuss why his interpretation of what the jury may have been thinking is other than conjecture. Grenier v. Royal Cab, Inc., 114 R.I. 11, 327 A.2d 272 (1974); and whether the judge’s omission of one of the reasons the plaintiff avoided doctors was an omission of a controlling issue. Morinville v. Morinville, 116 R.I. 507, 359 A.2d 48 (1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
366 A.2d 830, 117 R.I. 950, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-baggeston-ri-1976.