Ramsdill v. Swanick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramsdill v. Swanick

60 N.Y.S. 821, 45 A.D. 626

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 N.Y.S. 821 (Ramsdill v. Swanick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsdill v. Swanick, 60 N.Y.S. 821, 45 A.D. 626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record in this case does not disclose any exception or error of law for which the judgment should be reversed. As to questions of fact, and as to whether the verdict is excessive, we are precluded from examining them, for the reason that the record does not show that any order denying a motion for a new trial was ever entered, nor that the case contains all the evidence that was given upon the trial.

The judgment therefore must be affirmed, with costs.

PUTNAM, J., not acting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record in this case does not disclose any exception or error of law for which the judgment should be reversed. As to questions of fact, and as to whether the verdict is excessive, we are precluded from examining them, for the reason that the record does not show that any order denying a motion for a new trial was ever entered, nor that the case contains all the evidence that was given upon the trial.

The judgment therefore must be affirmed, with costs.

PUTNAM, J., not acting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.Y.S. 821, 45 A.D. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsdill-v-swanick-nyappdiv-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack