Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works of Paterson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works of Paterson

61 A.2d 197, 137 N.J.L. 561, 1948 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 37

DecidedSeptember 8, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.2d 197 (Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works of Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works of Paterson, 61 A.2d 197, 137 N.J.L. 561, 1948 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 37 (N.J. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

*562 The opinion of the court was delivered by

Donges, J.

This is a companion case to No. 282 of the present term. 137 N. J. L. 559. The same prosecutors as in that case here object to the granting of a variance for the use of the property of Blosmer Holding Company as a motor vehicle service station. The property of this defendant is located in the same block of Market Street and on the same side of the street as the one involved in case No. 282. The cases were heard, considered and determined together by the municipal bodies and the factual situation respecting the reasonableness of the relaxation of strict enforcement of the ordinance and the law respecting the power of the municipal bodies to act are the same in both cases. Eor the reasons expressed in the prior case, the writ of certiorari is dismissed, with costs.

Mr. Justice Colie dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*562 The opinion of the court was delivered by

Donges, J.

This is a companion case to No. 282 of the present term. 137 N. J. L. 559. The same prosecutors as in that case here object to the granting of a variance for the use of the property of Blosmer Holding Company as a motor vehicle service station. The property of this defendant is located in the same block of Market Street and on the same side of the street as the one involved in case No. 282. The cases were heard, considered and determined together by the municipal bodies and the factual situation respecting the reasonableness of the relaxation of strict enforcement of the ordinance and the law respecting the power of the municipal bodies to act are the same in both cases. Eor the reasons expressed in the prior case, the writ of certiorari is dismissed, with costs.

Mr. Justice Colie dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.2d 197, 137 N.J.L. 561, 1948 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsbotham-v-board-of-public-works-of-paterson-nj-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack