Rampersad v. State

752 So. 2d 94, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3412, 2000 WL 222248
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2000
DocketNo. 3D99-927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 752 So. 2d 94 (Rampersad v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rampersad v. State, 752 So. 2d 94, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3412, 2000 WL 222248 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mukesh Rampersad seeks to reverse his conviction for burglary and to be discharged. We reverse, and order Ramper-sad to be immediately released.

Rampersad, his ex-wife, and their children were out shopping for a new car for the ex-wife in a car rented several days earlier by Rampersad. The record indicates that they argued, and at some point in the argument, Rampersad, who was driving, pulled over to make a pay phone call and exited the vehicle; the ex-wife moved over into the driver’s seat and closed the door. Rampersad reached in through the window and struck his ex-wife, who suffered a bruised and lacerated cheek. Rampersad was charged with burglary of a conveyance, and with felony battery. Rampersad pleaded not guilty, went to jury trial, and was convicted of burglary with battery, and with simple battery. He was sentenced to five years in state prison on the burglary, and received a suspended sentence on the simple battery.

Pursuant to Delgado v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S79, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 124382 (Fla. 2000), we find that Ramper-sad committed no burglary. Rampersad was at the very least a licensee or invitee1 [95]*95as he was not precluded from re-entering the vehicle on his return from the phone booth. See also Stenson v. State, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 121288 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). We reverse Rampersad’s conviction and sentence for burglary and order that he be immediately released from custody, notwithstanding any petition for rehearing. We do not disturb the conviction and suspended sentence for the simple battery.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blount v. Spears
758 So. 2d 1287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
752 So. 2d 94, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3412, 2000 WL 222248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rampersad-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.