Blount v. Spears

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blount v. Spears

758 So. 2d 1287, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 2000 WL 763331

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 14, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-1187

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 758 So. 2d 1287 (Blount v. Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blount v. Spears, 758 So. 2d 1287, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 2000 WL 763331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

At first appearance, the magistrate determined that the arrest affidavit did not justify the felony charge of burglary with an assault asserted against the defendant Blount, reduced the offense to the misdemeanor of simple battery and ordered his release to pre-trial services with an alternative $1500.00 bond. On the basis only of the information filed by the State Attorney’s office for a non-bondable life felony of burglary with an assault, but see Rampersad v. State, 752 So.2d 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and without any further sworn testimony, the circuit judge at arraignment revoked the pre-trial release and ordered the defendant held without bond. This order was completely unjustified in light of the law that the filing of an information cannot itself provide probable cause, see Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975), and that, in the absence of a finding of probable cause based on sworn testimony, there can be no “restraint on liberty other than appearing for trial.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.133(a)(l)(4). On this basis, we have previously ordered Blount restored to the status ordered by the magistrate and now award him a final judgment in habeas corpus to that effect.

Habeas Corpus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

At first appearance, the magistrate determined that the arrest affidavit did not justify the felony charge of burglary with an assault asserted against the defendant Blount, reduced the offense to the misdemeanor of simple battery and ordered his release to pre-trial services with an alternative $1500.00 bond. On the basis only of the information filed by the State Attorney’s office for a non-bondable life felony of burglary with an assault, but see Rampersad v. State, 752 So.2d 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and without any further sworn testimony, the circuit judge at arraignment revoked the pre-trial release and ordered the defendant held without bond. This order was completely unjustified in light of the law that the filing of an information cannot itself provide probable cause, see Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975), and that, in the absence of a finding of probable cause based on sworn testimony, there can be no “restraint on liberty other than appearing for trial.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.133(a)(l)(4). On this basis, we have previously ordered Blount restored to the status ordered by the magistrate and now award him a final judgment in habeas corpus to that effect.

Habeas Corpus granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 So. 2d 1287, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 2000 WL 763331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blount-v-spears-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack