Ramos v. State

204 S.W. 335
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Tex. Crim. 479
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 29, 1918·No. No. 5053·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted o'f violating the local option law; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $62.50 and 20 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

There are no legal questions presented for revision. It is contended, however, that the evidence is not sufficient. The state’s testimony shows a sale by the defendant to the alleged purchaser ' Collins. Collins testified that he bought a quart and a half or a quart and a pint of whisky from appellant and paid him $2.75 for it. Appellant denies the transaction. This formed an issue of fact for solution by the jury. Under this condition of the record we would not feel justified in reversing the case.

The judgment therefore will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. State, 204 S.W. 335 (Tex. 1918).

204 S.W. 335 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.