Ramos v. State

204 S.W. 112, 83 Tex. Crim. 479, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 227
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 29, 1918
DocketNo. 5053.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 S.W. 112 (Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramos v. State, 204 S.W. 112, 83 Tex. Crim. 479, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 227 (Tex. 1918).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $63.50 and twenty days imprisonment in the county jail.

There are no legal questions presented for revision. It is contended, however, that the evidence is not sufficient. The State’s testimony shows a sale by the defendant to the alleged purchaser, Collins. Collins testified that he bought a quart and a half, or a quart and a pint of whisky from appellant and paid him $3.75 for it. Appellant denies the transaction. This formed an issue of fact for solution by the jury. Hnder this condition of the record we would not feel justified in reversing the case. The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Earls v. State
707 S.W.2d 82 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 S.W. 112, 83 Tex. Crim. 479, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-state-texcrimapp-1918.