Ramos v. State

88 So. 3d 997, 2012 WL 1698352, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2012·No. No. 2D11-2209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed; question certified.

SILBERMAN, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. State, 88 So. 3d 997, 2012 WL 1698352, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 997 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)