Ramos v. State
27 So. 3d 759, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344, 2010 WL 445695
Opinion
Carmen Ramos appeals from a conviction of grand theft of currency valued at $100,000 or more. We affirm because the issue complained of was not properly preserved for appellate review and in no way results in fundamental error. See Smith *760 v. State, 990 So.2d 1162, 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramos v. State, 27 So. 3d 759, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344, 2010 WL 445695 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
27 So. 3d 759 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
990 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)