Ramos v. State
779 So. 2d 384, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7540, 2000 WL 784040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 757 So. 2d 616 →
Opinion
Appellant’s sole contention is that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, under which he was sentenced for crimes occurring on March 11, 1997, are unconstitutional because the legislature’s enactment of chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject provision of Article III, Section 6, of the Florida Constitution. We agree and remand for reconsideration of sentence in accordance with Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and our [385]*385recent opinion in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramos v. State, 779 So. 2d 384, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7540, 2000 WL 784040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
779 So. 2d 384 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)