Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ramos v. State

727 So. 2d 1110, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2573, 1999 WL 137923

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 1999

DocketNo. 99-231

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 727 So. 2d 1110 (Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramos v. State, 727 So. 2d 1110, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2573, 1999 WL 137923 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Efrain Ramos appeals a trial court order denying his motion for extension of time to file a post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The order of the trial court is affirmed without prejudice to Ramos to file his motion before the expiration of the time provided under the rule, which time has not as yet expired. We leave to the discretion of the trial court motions that may be filed by Ramos to amend his post-conviction motion as appropriate.

Affirmed as stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Efrain Ramos appeals a trial court order denying his motion for extension of time to file a post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The order of the trial court is affirmed without prejudice to Ramos to file his motion before the expiration of the time provided under the rule, which time has not as yet expired. We leave to the discretion of the trial court motions that may be filed by Ramos to amend his post-conviction motion as appropriate.

Affirmed as stated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

727 So. 2d 1110, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2573, 1999 WL 137923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack