Ramos v. State
429 So. 2d 318, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28247
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1981·No. No. 80-2354·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, there being no error in the trial' court’s denial of his motion to suppress. However, appellant’s fingerprints are not affixed to the order constituting the judgment and sentence as required by section 921.241, Florida Statutes (1979). That order is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for entry of a proper judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramos v. State, 429 So. 2d 318, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
429 So. 2d 318 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nevels v. State
6 So. 3d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Turner v. State
429 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)