Nevels v. State
6 So. 3d 117, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3189, 2009 WL 996399
Opinion
Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979).
We note that the record does not contain a formal judgment with appellant’s fingerprints affixed, as required by section 921.241(1), Florida Statutes (2007). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.986. Accordingly, we direct the trial court on remand to enter such a judgment. See Ramos v. State, 429 So.2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (affirming conviction and sentence, but vacating judgment and sentence order and remanding for entry of a proper judgment).
Affmned but remanded for entry of formal judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevels v. State, 6 So. 3d 117, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3189, 2009 WL 996399 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
6 So. 3d 117 (Nevels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. State
373 So. 2d 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Ramos v. State
429 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)