Ramona Constantaras v. American Security Insurance Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 2015
DocketA15A1466
StatusPublished

This text of Ramona Constantaras v. American Security Insurance Company (Ramona Constantaras v. American Security Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramona Constantaras v. American Security Insurance Company, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 05, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1466. RAMONA CONSTANTARAS, et al. v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

Ramona and Basil Constantaras, plaintiffs in the case below, seek appellate review of the trial court’s orders granting various defendants’ motions to dismiss. On November 5, 2014, the trial court dismissed the Constantarases’ claims against American Security Insurance Company and Standard Insurance Company. The Constantarases filed a notice of appeal from that order, which has been docketed as Case No. A15A1466. On December 8, 2014, the trial court dismissed the Constantarases’ remaining claims. They filed a notice of appeal from that order, which has been docketed as Case No. A15A1465. American Security Insurance Company and Standard Insurance Company have filed a motion to dismiss Case No. A15A1466 for failure to follow the interlocutory appeals procedure. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” (Punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989); see also Yates v. CACV of Colorado, 295 Ga. App. 69 (670 SE2d 884) (2008). Thus, the order from which the Constantarases appeal in Case No. A15A1466 was not final. To appeal that order, the Constantarases were required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Johnson, supra. They failed to do so. The fact that an appealable judgment now exists does not cure the fatal defect in the notice of appeal in the instant case. See Richardson v. General Motors Corp., 221 Ga. App. 583, 583-584 (472 SE2d 143) (1996). However, the November 5, 2014, order can be enumerated as error as part of the appeal in Case No. A14A1465, pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (d). Accordingly, American Security Insurance Company and Standard Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/05/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLC
670 S.E.2d 884 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Johnson v. Hospital Corporation of America
385 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Richardson v. General Motors Corp.
472 S.E.2d 143 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ramona Constantaras v. American Security Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramona-constantaras-v-american-security-insurance--gactapp-2015.