Ramirez v. State
438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1983·No. No. 82-857·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm defendant Eva Ramirez’s convictions and the sentences entered thereon upon a holding that a defendant who voluntarily absents herself during the course of the trial proceedings cannot later be heard to complain, without a proper and timely objection during the course of the proceedings, of procedural irregularity. See Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); State v. Melendez, 244 So.2d 137 (Fla.1971); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a), (b).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramirez v. State, 438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
438 So. 2d 976 (Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barber v. State
438 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)