Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ramirez v. State

438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1983

DocketNo. 82-857

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 So. 2d 976 (Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramirez v. State, 438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant Eva Ramirez’s convictions and the sentences entered thereon upon a holding that a defendant who voluntarily absents herself during the course of the trial proceedings cannot later be heard to complain, without a proper and timely objection during the course of the proceedings, of procedural irregularity. See Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); State v. Melendez, 244 So.2d 137 (Fla.1971); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a), (b).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant Eva Ramirez’s convictions and the sentences entered thereon upon a holding that a defendant who voluntarily absents herself during the course of the trial proceedings cannot later be heard to complain, without a proper and timely objection during the course of the proceedings, of procedural irregularity. See Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); State v. Melendez, 244 So.2d 137 (Fla.1971); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a), (b).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack