Ramirez v. State
This text of 383 So. 2d 319 (Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Julian RAMIREZ a/K/a Julian Rodriguez, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Julian Ramirez, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, this court having required response by the State and having considered the record presented and the State's response and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 So. 2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.